“The Wuhan Cover-Up”: Commentaries by Autism Librarian -Ch. 32

June 23, 2026

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. wrote:

…Baric has trained his Wuhan lab counterparts in the secrets of genetically engineering pandemic coronaviruses. He taught them how to clone large quantities of stable synthetic viruses from small snippets of genetic information, how to employ his secret techniques for engineering infectious clones -by transferring spike proteins genetically engineered to enhance viral infectivity in human cells from one bat coronavirus to another- and how to do the “seamless ligation” that conceals the evidence of human tampering. (pg. 186)

Autism Librarian study notes– author notes since 1986 Ralph Baric has received $230 million in grants from NIH/NIAID. Chapter 27 reference regarding biolab incidents: “2013-2020- 9 incidents of infected lab mice escapes; 6 employee exposures to coronaviruses after 2015; 28 accidents involving genetically engineered coronaviruses; mouse bites; from Ralph Baric’s lab…”

By the author’s criticism of the Patriot Act utilization to violate/bypass/”nullify” the Geneva Protocol/BWC, is the implication that NIH/NIAID are complicit in violations of these international treaties, whereby the Patriot Act lacks foundation/basis due to the 2001 anthrax attacks being linked back to Pentagon’s “Project Bacchus” and the FBI’s ordering of the destruction in Ames, Iowa of same anthrax-strains used in the anthrax letters, as well as the context of the international treaty ratified by the USA?

Are all government health agencies that fund bioweapons research, which the author notes continued under the re-titling as “gain-of-function” research and vaccine research, violating the Geneva Protocol/BWC international treaties?

The “New York Times Bestselling Author” writes:

…in 2015 Baric filed a patent on the engineered spike protein he had developed, giving him potential ownership and royalty claims on the vaccines and therapeutics that might be sold in any pandemic arising from his engineered viruses. NIH also owned patent march-in rights in the Moderna vaccine by virtue of their NIAID grant that funded the mRNA platform’s development. In 2021, NIH took the unprecedented step of demanding that Moderna give co-ownership rights to the US government. Baric also further hedged his bets against the eventuality of such a coronavirus pandemic via patent claims the only EUA-approved antiviral, remdesivir. (pg. 186-187)

Autism Librarian study notes– provided the current Secretary of HHS’s criticism of Ralph Baric for his work on engineering viruses and simultaneously filing patent and royalty claims on vaccines in response to the viruses his research engineered via NIH/NIAID funding, as well as Baric’s patent claims on remdesivir for treating coronavirus infection, as well as NIH’s attempts to obtain co-ownership of mRNA intellectual properties…how does the current Secretary of HHS intend to address Non-Clinical Toxicology safety tests for pharmaceuticals, whereby a government/”Big Pharma” researcher such as Ralph Baric, or perhaps even government agencies like the NIH/CDC/FDA may develop pharmaceuticals with genotoxic/carcinogenic effects and simultaneously patent pharmaceuticals that might be sold to treat the negative consequences of those pharmaceuticals? (i.e., the implication/criticism by the current Secretary of HHS being that a researcher should not both create viruses/disease and hold patents to the therapeutic for that virus/disease -of course, already a violation of the contextual criticisms of the book via bioweapons research that should not have been conducted post-1975 ratification of the international treaties on bioweapons development).

A matter exactly as this occurred recently under the current Secretary of HHS’s leadership. In 2025, the FDA indicated partnership with vaccine manufacturer Glaxosmithkline -now regarded as bioweapons and/or bioweapons-defense manufacturer in the context of “The Wuhan Cover-Up” authored by the current Secretary of HHS, since vaccines were designed to address the “blowback” of the use of bioweapons in warfare- to obtain approval for Wellcovorin [2], a previously approved drug which until 2026 had no available package inserts on the FDA website [5]; however, an Epoch Times reporter indicated in 2026 that the bioweapons-defense manufacturer would no longer be producing Wellcovorin [6].

If the implication -per the current Secretary of HHS afore-quoted criticisms of Baric- is that a researcher should not both create viruses/disease and hold patents to the therapeutic for that virus/disease, as well as the context of “The Wuhan Cover-Up” regarding of as bioweapons research being conducted under the pretense of “vaccine-research,” then how can a company/researcher develop a pharmaceutical for a disease if they don’t know that zero-of-their-other-pharmaceuticals on the market has impacted the onset/development of that disease via genotoxic/carcinogenic effects?

“Today’s approval represents a significant milestone for patients living with cerebral folate transport deficiency due to the FOLR1 variant, a rare genetic condition that has had no FDA-approved treatment options until today,” said FDA Commissioner Marty Makary, M.D., M.P.H. [3].

Additionally, how does the current Secretary of HHS intend to address the approval of leucovorin calcium, whom FDA package inserts reveal has never undergone genotoxicity/carcinogenicity safety tests [4], for what the FDA simultaneously refers to as a genetic condition?

Is the HHS/FDA recommending a product with unknown potential genotoxicity for a genetic condition?

This would add another layer of criticism to the current Secretary of HHS’s criticisms of Baric; in his case, the criticisms was filing patents for drugs/vaccines against viruses he was developing.

In the case of Wellcovorin, the criticism extends: a vaccine-manufacturer (GSK), seemingly partnered with the FDA to treat autism symptoms [3], where the current Secretary of HHS for over 20 years has implicated vaccines in autism development.

In the context of Non-Clinical Toxicology, the criticism extends yet further: a vaccine-manufacturer (GSK), seemingly partnered with the FDA to treat autism symptoms [3], where the current Secretary of HHS for over 20 years has implicated vaccines in autism development, where lacking Non-Clinical Toxicology do not rule out genotoxic/carcinogenic effects of single, multiple, and cumulative doses of vaccines that may impact autism development [7-8], where lacking Non-Clinical Toxicology safety tests for Wellcovorin additionally do not rule out genotoxic/carcinogenic effects for additional adverse and unknown health outcomes.

How does the HHS/FDA/CDC/NIH reconcile this?

Please also see, if needed:

“The Wuhan Cover-Up”: Commentaries by Autism Librarian (Chs. 1-3)

“The Wuhan Cover-Up”: Commentaries by Autism Librarian (Chs. 4-6)

“The Wuhan Cover-Up”: Commentaries by Autism Librarian -Chs. 7-8

“The Wuhan Cover-Up”: Commentaries by Autism Librarian -Chs. 9-13

“The Wuhan Cover-Up”: Commentaries by Autism Librarian -Chs. 14-15

“The Wuhan Cover-Up”: Commentaries by Autism Librarian -Chs. 16-18

“The Wuhan Cover-Up”: Commentaries by Autism Librarian -Chs. 19-22

“The Wuhan Cover-Up”: Commentaries by Autism Librarian -Chs. 23-24

“The Wuhan Cover-Up”: Commentaries by Autism Librarian -Chs. 25-27

“The Wuhan Cover-Up”: Commentaries by Autism Librarian -Chs. 28-29