The Causes of Autism

The World's 1st Multi-Literature Autism Research Conglomerate

Notice: Scientific inquiry on TheCausesofAutism.com is protected to the full extent of the Constitution of the United States of America under 1st Amendment rights. This is a library of scientific research interpretation and investigation. No medical advice is intended or provided. Publications are a working-dissertation subject to updates in hypotheses, postulations, research questions, etc. as the massive literature is reviewed.

Hypothesizing More Equations: Did Aristotle Miss a Linguistic Fallacy?

April 28, 2026

Absolute(Truth) ≠ Probable(Truth)
dividing both sides of the equation by ‘Truth’ leaves:
Absolute ≠ Probable, because ‘Truth’ is cancelled out from both sides, which returns us to Event ≠ Event-Probability,
where Event = Absolute and Probable = Event-Probability.

Can it be written as follows thus?

Absolute(Event) ≠ Probable(Event)
dividing both sides of the equation by ‘Event’ Leaves:
Absolute ≠ Probable, where the definition/understanding of the word ‘Event’ must still speak to absolute events or probable events, where absolutism and probability speak to events themselves because there is no data without the absolute event that establishes the probability of events.

If,
Absolute Event = 1 Data point
Absolute Not-Event = 1 Data point
Absolute(Truth) = ∞
then…
∞ ≠ Pr(∞)
and Pr(∞) approximates infinity.

I would logically conclude/hypothesize then, that it is a linguistic fallacy (to use Aristotle’s term) to reject an event as never happening or always happening when the data itself is establishing the probabilities of events happening or not happening. In other words, “it happens” is mutually exclusive from “never happens.”

Never Happens ≠ It Happens, because the ‘It Happens’ is obtained from the data itself and establishing a probability for ‘It Happening.’

I’ve begun calling this a Fallacy of Linguistic Inclusivity where Event is not supposed to equal Event-Probability (written as Event = Event-Probability or perhaps also ∞ = Pr(∞)…, when it’s actually E ≠ Pr(E) and ∞ ≠ Pr(∞)…). Event and Event-Probability are mutually exclusive in linguistics and may be leading to errors.

Preliminary hypothesized autism equation:

Autism ≠ Autism-Probability (ASD-PR)
ASD-PR = (case genetics impacting probability)(pesticides impacting probability)(air pollution impacting probability)(valproate impacting probability)(vaccine-adverse events impacting probability)(acetaminophen impacting probability)(maternal nutrition impacting probability, either for increased or decrease probability)(germline mutations impacting probability)(other factors with an existing literature impacting probability)(protective factors that may decrease the probability)…

This is based on a standard behavioral diagnosis of autism.

However, another equation may be written:

Autism-Biomarker ≠ Probability of Autism Biomarker (bioASD-PR)
bioASD-PR = (case genetics impacting probability of biomarker)(pesticides impacting biomarker probability)(air pollution impacting biomarker probability)…etc etc etc. Worth noting is that this equation is per biomarker and thus more generalizable to individuals without a behavioral autism diagnosis that may have a biomarker but not meet behavioral criteria for a diagnosis.

Autism Librarian

Shh. Quiet in the hall.